Archive for May, 2008

Book Review: To Cork or Not To Cork by George Taber

Saturday, May 31st, 2008

taber_cork.jpgThere’s only one thing, you might say, that stands between a thirsty wine lover and her wine. And luckily, that obstacle is usually easily overcome with one or more variations on a twist of a wrist.

Corks, screwcaps, crowncaps, glass stoppers, plastic corks, synthetic corks, agglomerated corks, the list goes on and on. 20 billion of them are used each year, and these closures which seal our precious bottles of wine are given very little thought by most wine drinkers. Indeed, we only tend to notice them when they are unexpected — a screwcap when we were thinking about cork, an exotic glass stopper sealed with a bit of tape– or when they give us particular trouble as we make our way to our desired glass.

Despite the fact that wine bottle closures are quite possibly the most critical technological component to the quality of the wine that we drink (once the winemaking and barrel aging process is complete) they are arguably the most mis-understood and under-appreciated aspects of wine production.

And while corks and their various replacements are ultimately the only things that prevent wine from becoming vinegar, they are also responsible for the ruination of millions of bottles of wine each year.

I’m not sure which is ultimately more stupefying — that after 2500 years we haven’t found a foolproof way to seal up a bottle of wine or that no one bothered to write an explanation of the reason why, until George Taber published To Cork or Not to Cork: Tradition, Romance, Science, and the Battle for the Wine Bottle.

Wine lovers who also like to indulge their passion through the written word will remember Taber for his previous work Judgment of Paris, the dramatic exposition of the 1976 Paris Tasting in which California wines were selected over their French counterparts in a blind tasting by French Judges.

To Cork or Not To Cork again demonstrates Taber’s skills as an investigative journalist and beautifully showcases his clear and cogent writing. There aren’t many page turners in the world of wine books, but this definitive history of wine closures comes awfully close.

Taber manages to coax a dramatic narrative out of an incredible array of research sources, starting from the historical and scientific background of corks, through the method of their production, the history of the industry, and the remarkable array of alternative closures that have arisen in the past few decades.

“To the wine consuming public,” Taber writes, “a cork is a cork is a cork,” but Taber does an excellent job of both explaining the wide variation in the means, method, and history of cork production, as well as the cause and extent of the dreaded cork taint that ultimately serves as both the villain and the catalyst for action in his narrative.

Cork taint, which often goes by TCA, a shortened version of its full name 2,4,6 Trichoroanisole, is a naturally occurring chemical compound that has doubtless been ruining wine for centuries. Yet readers may be surprised to learn that it was only identified as a cause of wine spoilage in 1981 thanks to the dedicated work of the Swiss German chemist Hans Tanner. His discovery of this compound, its common occurrence in cork, and the concentration levels at which it usually produces the aromas and flavors of wet cardboard in wine marks the beginning of the modern history of the wine cork.

Tanner’s findings set off a chain of events that Taber carefully explains and chronicles, covering the invention, development, marketing (and often subsequent failure) of the major synthetic corks and cork substitutes, as well as the crisis and near collapse of the cork industry as it attempted to deal with the impact of the proof that its product was faulty a large percentage of the time.

The world of cork and its would be successors is filled with interesting personalities, successes and failures, each carefully detailed by Taber as he explores the past 30 years of the wine world’s efforts to combat an invisible foe.

Generally, each chapter deals with a different player in the world of wine closures, and many tell the stories behind the technologies and trends that are commonplace in the wine world today, from the prevalence of screwcaps in New Zealand wine, to the spongy plastic corks that have begun to seal many of the wines found on grocery store shelves.

In between these chapters, Taber has inserted short stories of wine lovers and their own personal experiences dealing with faulty and perfect corks. Almost in admission of their melodrama, these “Messages in a Bottle” are italicized, and are frankly superfluous. They presumably were inserted to emphasize the reality of the cork taint problem, but they are more hokey than helpful.

Luckily these passages are easy to skip in favor of Taber’s excellent summaries of modern research on closures which are bound to teach even the most seasoned wine lover a thing or two. I learned that there is still no definitive scientific answer to how or whether corks actually transmit oxygen to the wine, nor how crucial this oxygen is in the maturation of the wine, for instance, and that the length of a cork in relation to the length of the neck of the bottle can have a dramatic effect on the cork’s potential to contaminate the wine.

It can’t be counted as a failing of To Cork or Not to Cork that it fails to answer its own title question. After 24 chapters and a section entitled “conclusion” that doesn’t really come to one (at least as far as the main question is concerned), the only certainty I could take from the book is that the world has still not found the perfect way to seal a bottle of wine or to eliminate taint from corks completely. But I now know a lot more about the people looking for both and how they are going about it, so I can say confidently that all we wine lovers have to do is watch from the sidelines with a glass in hand.

buy-from-tan.gif George Taber, To Cork or Not To Cork: Tradition, Romance, Science, and the Battle for the Wine Bottle , Scribner 2007, $17.16, (Hardcover).

Original post by Alfonso Cevola

Coffee and breast cancer

Friday, May 30th, 2008

Coffee, tea and caffeine don’t increase risk of breast cancer
generic health

Apparently, women can drink all the coffee or tea they want and not increase their risk for breast cancer.

More >>

Original post by Robert

Coffee market: Arabica down

Friday, May 30th, 2008

[Dow Jones] -ICE July arabica coffee is down 175 points at $1.3385 a pound, erasing an early gain, with Sep off 180 points. “We fell back as the dollar firmed after U.S. GDP growth was reported and on thinking the Fed might raise rates eventually,” a New York desk trader says.

More >>

Original post by Robert

Do Mechanics Dream of Riesling?

Thursday, May 29th, 2008

I took the test. Twice. I thought the results the first time were a shade off. The second time I took it, that was more like it. I knew there was a reason why I like Riesling, and so it seems many people do. And Pinot Grigio and White Zinfandel. And Lambrusco. Whoa, hold on a minute, let’s not get carried away.

The assessment was at the Budometer, which is a web site dreamt up by mad-scientist Tim Hanni. It’s a quick test where one can determine where they stand as a taster. The basic four groups are Tolerant, Sensitive, Hyper-Sensitive and Sweet tasters. I’m somewhere between a Sensitive and a Tolerant taster. Give it a try, you might be surprised. It will definitely challenge your ideas of what you “think” you like vs. what your taste buds are calibrated for.

His point, one of many, was that wee folks in the wine industry, marketers, masters, sommeliers and critics, set up tents that we’d like to think everybody needs to fit under, in order for them to “get” what we pro’s know, like the back of our ass. Because of that point of view, we are leaving a lot of people in the parking lot, not letting them through the ropes, because they don’t enjoy what we enjoy, because they have unsophisticated tastes, because they like sweet wine. When, in many cases, it seems to be physiological preferences, not intellectual choices, that rule the tongue and taste.

One of his observations was that he thinks Robert Parker might be a Tolerant taster, where one with his preferences likes wines that are big, oaky, powerful and rich. Hanni’s said, “Parker found the formula for the Tolerant tasters,” indicating that the Bob set up a scenario whereby those folks who have his tastes can find their advocate for their tastes. Being a partial Tolerant, I can understand the pleasure and the allure, although I do enjoy my Riesling and my Aglianico.

It also clarified why Parker and Jancis Robinson had such different ideas about wines like Pavie. Robinson, Hanni claims, is a Hyper-Sensitive taster.

It also explains why someone like Alice Feiring’s book and Op-Ed pieces are eliciting screams and hostile responses. Different strokes, it seems to me. Take the test, go to the site; it’ll open up the pod bay doors of your mind.

Open the pod bay doors, Edvard

Hanni is heading up a psycho-sensory studies department at Copia in Napa, delving into this and other areas of research. Yeah, he’s a bit of a nutty professor, like Bucky Fuller and John Lilly. I dig it.

Fascinating stuff. Check it out.

While on the subject, it overlays with thoughts I have been having about wine styles lately. While I do appreciate natural wines, very much, I have had a couple of “very California” wines that I have truly enjoyed. One was a Merlot Cab Blend from Pellegrini, called Milestone. It was gulpable and delicious. That works for me. Not always, but this time, yes.

Three days later, in the patio of Bayona in New Orleans, I tried to order a bottle of Savennières and was shot down by my buddy, Guy Stout. Now Guy is a Good ‘ol boy and a Master Somm to boot, but at that time of the night he was objecting to the high acid of Loire Valley Chenin, while I was Jonesing for acid and mineral, with a little fruit topping. We compromised on a Julienas. Talk about a 180° .

Three can keep a secret, if two of them are poached

That difference in taste and preference, in any giving day, and subject to change, is beginning to explain why there are so many different kinds of Valpolicella Ripasso and Amarone’s floating around out there.

Hey, when a winemaker comes at you with his bottle thinking he has all the answers, here’s what to do. Take your red cape, get out of the way, swirl a bit to make your move look good, and get ready for the next winemaker, or critic, to pass your way with his sharpened horns of opinion. Don’t get hooked. You’re not necessarily wrong about what you like. So you might only have been getting into Italian wine, or wine in general, for a month or a year. Doesn’t matter. You are where you are. Live with it. Embrace it. Enjoy it.

Dream a little dream for me.

written and photographed by Alfonso Cevola limited rights reserved On the Wine Trail in Italy

Original post by Alfonso Cevola

Marin County Pinot Noir Tasting: June 14th, Larkspur

Thursday, May 29th, 2008

Most of the major appellations of California tend to have their own large tastings, where members of the public have an opportunity to sample a broad range of wines from a specific area. These tastings, as I am fond of reminding you readers, are by far the best way to educate your palate and to learn both what you like and do not like, but also who you like and do not like when it comes to California wine. These tastings are the best places to discover your next favorite wine.

This particular wine tasting may be a chance to discover more than that, however. Even the most informed wine lovers may not be aware that there is an increasing amount of wine produced just north of the Golden Gate bridge, nearly 60 minutes closer than the southernmost vineyards of Napa and Sonoma.

Marin has a long history of winegrowing, however, stretching back into the 19th century, and while those early pioneers long ago abandoned the foggy hillsides north of the bridge for warmer regions like the Livermore Valley, there are a set of new pioneers who are teasing out some very interesting wines from the chilly hills and valleys of Marin County.

This small tasting, which benefits the Marin Agricultural Land Trust, a non-profit organization focused on helping preserve agricultural lands from development, offers a chance to sample wines from more than a dozen well known producers who are either based in Marin, or making wines with Marin county grapes.

I’ve had a few of these wines, and coveted a few more, and this is definitely a tasting that’s worth crossing the bridge, and donating fifty bucks to a good cause to attend.

Marin Winegrowers’ Association Pinot Noir Tasting
Saturday, June 14th
2:00 PM to 7:00 PM
Historic Escalle Winery
771 Magnolia Ave.
Larkspur, CA 94939 (map)

Tickets are $50 (which also covers valet parking for the event) and are only available for purchase online. This event regularly sells out, so if you’re thinking of attending, you should purchase your tickets now.

Original post by Alfonso Cevola

Shock & Ah

Wednesday, May 28th, 2008

A few weeks ago, several of us were sitting around a table in Manhattan with a winemaker from Montalcino. Somewhere between his unreleased 2004 and the historic 1971, the observer in me saw a face on the label. I took a picture of it, out of focus. It reminded me of something from when my son was a little boy. And then it hit me, there it was, staring at me.

This particular producer espouses traditional methods for making Brunello. He is waiting, as are many of us, for the whole Montalcino mess to run its course.

First it was shock and now it is “Ah, hey fellahs, ready when you are.”

So we wait, open a bottle of NegroAmaro, and wait for the carousel to play out its song.

Heard in the trade: “These days, the wines from Puglia are appearing to be more authentic than their northern counterparts.”

Would that be before they discovered French oak, micro-ox, reverse-oz and designer yeasts? Say, like, in 1977?

written by Alfonso Cevola limited rights reserved On the Wine Trail in Italy

Original post by Alfonso Cevola

Slovenian Wine: A New Frontier for White Wine Lovers

Tuesday, May 27th, 2008

The wine world increasingly sorts out into two camps, those who believe increasing globalization is good for the wine industry, and those who believe that it ruins everything good about wine. Never mind that it is most certainly happening and impossible to stop. Those who regularly follow my ramblings know that I think globalization is the best thing to happen to wine since someone figured out that stainless steel tanks made for good fermentations.

Leaving aside all the petty and ridiculous arguments about the homogenization of wine, slovenian_coat_of_arms.gifwhich I think are bollocks, I offer the simplest and most compelling reason that globalization is good for wine:

Slovenia.

The folks in Slovenia have been making wine since even before the region was a part of the Roman empire, of course, but some of the wineries operating today have been in business since the 1500’s. Yet until recently very few people in the United States had even heard of Slovenian wine, let alone tasted any.

Globalization more than anything else means that the market for wine, even ones made in tiny countries, by tiny producers, from slightly obscure grapes have a chance to reach wine lovers all over the world. And if they’re good, they have the chance to reach levels of popularity that would never have been possible based on the local demand of their region, or even neighboring countries. Perhaps the most well known success story of this kind in the region is Movia, whose wines I reviewed yesterday. But Slovenia is much bigger than Movia, and there are a lot of wines worth paying attention to.

Slovenia’s three primary winegrowing regions of Podravje, Primorska, and Posavje are planted to around 60,000 acres of vineyards, representing more than one percent of the nation’s tiny 7,827 square miles of territory. With more than 40,000 registered wineries according to the Oxford Companion to Wine, it’s not hard to believe that the average vineyard size for the country falls somewhere in the 8 to 15 acre zone.

This incredible diversity of producers may partially be responsible for Slovenian wine staying off the radar for so long, as most producers are so small that they wouldn’t have enough wine to sell on the global market even if they could afford to get it there.

Thanks to the work of some dedicated importers and the increasingly global view of many wine lovers, the world is getting more experience with this region and it’s history of producing distinctive wines.

Slovenia was the first republic to declare independence in the dissolution of the former Yugoslavia, but before that nation was cobbled together, it sat at a major crossroads in the Hapsburg empire that, in some form or another, ruled the region even before the collapse of the Holy Roman Empire.

Snuggled as it is between the Mediterranean on the south, Italy on the West, Croatia on the East, and the Austrian Alps to the north (beautifully summarized by the country’s coat of arms, seen above), it will come as no surprise that the region’s major influences when it comes to wine are Italian, German and Hungarian with some French sensibility thrown into the mix.

Nothing is a greater influence on Slovenian wine, however, than the extremely variable climate of the region, which can vary to such a great degree that the size of the country’s wine production regularly fluctuates twenty or thirty percentage points from vintage to vintage.

Like most relatively developed indigenous wine regions, Slovenia produces both red and white wines, but in my experience the white wines are by far the best and most interesting, and in some cases are nothing short of world-class. These whites are either made as single varietals or as blends, using a wide variety of techniques, from the more traditional vinification in large, old oak casks, to modern stainless steel winemaking.

Regardless of the methods used, Slovenian winemakers are producing distinctive wines from familiar grapes like Pinot Gris, Riesling, and Sauvignon Blanc; to less well known varieties such as Ribolla Gialla, Malvasia, Traminer, and Sylvaner; to the downright obscure Kerner, Pikolit, Vitovska, Sipon, and Pinela.

It is quite unwise of me to broadly characterize the wines of an entire country, as there are great variations, from the sweet dessert wines of the southeast, to the crisp whites of the western region that falls within the unique extension of Italy’s Collio appellation. However, I will say that I find Slovenian whites to be extremely distinctive, and quite unlike white wines from anywhere else, save some of the producers in Italy’s neighboring Friuli region. The best Slovenian wines, even those with residual sugar, seem to offer amazing combinations of floral, tropical fruit, and more earthy qualities, often with a touch of oxidation that gives them somewhat of an “ancient” quality.

Any wine lover who enjoys white wines I strongly urge to seek out some Slovenian wine and give it a try.

Here are some tasting notes from some of the best Slovenian whites I have had recently.

Full disclosure: I received these wines as press samples.

2003 Kogl M.D. Albus “Magna Domenica” White Wine, Podravje, Slovenia
Pale, greenish gold in color, this blend of Riesling, Yellow Muscat, and Auxerrois has a nose that combines slightly funky aromas of wet wool and wet wood with beautiful scents of white blossoms and ripe melon. In the mouth it tastes of paraffin, pear, and white flowers wrapped around a core of tart melon flavor. The decent (though perhaps not sharp enough for my taste) acidity brings a lightly mineral, even metallic quality to the long, intriguing finish. Score: between 8.5 and 9. Cost: $17.00. Where to buy?

2005 Kogl “Mea Culpa” White Wine, Podravje, Slovenia
Greenish gold in the glass, this wine has a gorgeous nose of acacia flowers, juicy peaches, and paraffin, which hints at the Riesling that makes up the majority of the wine. In the mouth the wine is beautifully balanced and offers a gorgeously complex pastiche of chamomile, lemon zest, and mineral qualities that are electrified by excellent acids and textured with silky smoothness. The flavors blend and swirl into a long, satisfying finish. In a word, “yum.” Score: between 9 and 9.5. Cost: $19.99. Where to buy?

1999 Batic Reserve Pinot Gris, Vipava Valley, Slovenia
This wine pours a beautiful medium gold, even slightly orange in the glass. Orange wine is nearly always a good sign! It smells of honey and freshly shelled nuts. The nutty qualities continue into the waxy body of the wine which has a lightly oxidized quality that I find utterly compelling. The nuts and rainwater flavors carry through a long finish that seems to defiantly challenge anyone who says aged Pinot Gris can’t turn into something special if made in the right way. Score: around 9. Cost: $29.95. Where to buy?

2004 Batic Pinot Gris Riserva, Vipava Valley, Slovenia
I don’t think I’ve ever seen a wine quite this color before — gorgeously orange-pink in the glass it reads visually more as a rose than a white wine, making me wonder if it didn’t have a period of extended contact with the skins to extract such a hue. It’s nose is equally wondrous - a jewel-like confection of candied apple, red apple skin, and exotic spices. In the mouth it is nicely balanced with good acid and a weighty presence on the tongue that dances flavors of paraffin, red apple skin, and those same hard-to-pin-down spices across the palate. The wine’s finish is unusually short, but despite this deficit, it is most certainly one of the most distinctive wines I have ever had in my mouth. Score: between 9 and 9.5. Cost: $26.95. Where to buy?

2004 Vinakoper “Santomas” Malvasia, Primorje, Slovenia
Light gold in the glass, this wine smells of melon and honey. In the mouth it seduces with a silky texture and a waxy pear and melon mix of flavors that swirl pleasingly with good acid into a moderate finish. Score: between 8.5 and 9. Cost: $15.00. Where to buy?

2006 Crnko “Rumeni Muskat” Yellow Muscat, Maribor, Slovenia
Pale green-gold in color, this wine has an intoxicating nose of melon, kiwi, and other exotic tropical fruits. It’s hard not to simply want to sit and smell this wine for several minutes. In the mouth, the wine offers bright flavors of sultanas and hints of the melon in the nose. A slightly waxy quality tangos with a light spritz on the tongue as the wine finishes without quite living up to the promise of the nose. This Slovenian rendition of the Austrian “Gelber Muskateller” grape is good for drinking, but even better for smelling. Score: around 8.5. Cost: $21.95. Where to buy?

SEE ALSO: Some of my other Slovenian wine reviews:

Original post by Alfonso Cevola

Movia, Slovenia: Current Releases

Tuesday, May 27th, 2008

movia-logotip_2.jpgVisitors to the far Northeast of Italy, in the shadows of the Austrian Alps, quickly realize that they are not really in Italy, no matter what the maps say. Traveling to the east of Venice and north of Trieste puts one in the midst of a a patchwork quilt of languages, geography, and political affiliations. One town will speak perfect Italian, and you’ll find risotto on every table and then a few kilometers away, another town will speak German and serve you knockwurst. Such diversity is actually quite entertaining and makes for a really interesting variety of food and, as luck would have it, wine, too.

At the broadest level, the winemaking region of Northeast Italy is known as Friuli, which along with the Trentino Alto-Adige is the most well known and largest producing area for making white wines in Italy. Within the Friuli, the appellation which covers Italy’s border with Slovenia is known as Collio, or more properly, Collio Goriziano, after the Italian for hill (colli). This area of the country has really only been part of Italy proper since the end of the First World War, when maps of the region were redrawn. It should come as no surprise that when those maps were negotiated at Versailles, they didn’t exactly think about where the vineyards would end up.

According to Ales Kristancic (pronounced alesh chris-stan-zick) it was pretty much just a case of incompetent bureaucracy that resulted in the Kristancic family wine estate straddling the border of Italy and Slovenia, with 20 acres on the Italian side and 18 acres on the Slovenian side. As far as he’s concerned the land for many kilometers on either side of the border is just a single appellation: Collio.

It’s only really due to the fact that the family mailbox is in Slovenia that the whole family operation bears that country’s name. I’m sure for the Kristancics, who have owned their estate, called Movia, since 1820, this is just one more in a series of geopolitical identities, which too shall pass in time.

The Kristancics have better things to worry about than what flag flies over their vineyards. These are serious winemakers who are working an estate that has been operated in the Collio, and now the Brda (the Slovenian name for the same region) since before any of them can remember (at least three centuries). The Movia estate, one of the larger ones in the region, is currently under the stewardship of Ales, who grew up working alongside his father in the vineyards.

Largely due to his father’s guidance, Movia moved first to organic production and then to full biodynamic production, which they have maintained for nearly the full 20 years that Ales has been working the estate. This means, among other things, that all six thousand cases of wine that Movia produces each year are racked painstakingly by hand the wine at the new moon so as to remove sediment without need for fining or filtering.

All Movia wines are aged in mostly Slavonian oak casks, with some French oak mixed in, and all of them age on the lees (the sediment left over after fermentation) for sometimes up to several years before bottling.

To say that Ales Kristancic is a winemaker with vision may perhaps drastically understate the degree to which he is forging an entirely unique path in the wine world. With little precedent, but backed up by three generations of carefully cultivated family winemaking knowledge, Kristancic is making some of the strangest and most beautiful wines on the planet. From his undisgorged sparkling wine called Puro that requires underwater opening to remove the plug of yeast from the bottle; to the otherworldly rendition of the indigenous Ribolla Gialla grape in his Lunar bottling; to the nearly sacrilegious blending of Cabernet, Merlot, and Pinot Noir in the Veliko Rosso; Movia operates only according to the rules inside Kristancic’s head.

But let’s be clear, this is no crackpot of a winemaker. Even without praise from those in the wine industry who say he’s one of the most knowledgeable winemakers and viticulturalists they’ve ever met, Kristancic has to be good to make wines the way he does. His winemaking is like a trapeze act without a safety net — there is very little technology to fall back on at Movia. No commercial yeasts, no temperature controls, no precisely toasted oak barrels, no fining, no filtration, and only the tiniest addition of sulfur dioxide is used to keep the wines from hosting unwanted bacteria. And then of course there are the rigorous vineyard practices that forbid pesticides, fertilizers, and other modern protections against mildew, rot, and the many nasties that can destroy any given vintage. Such is the life of a biodynamic vintner.

Movia has only recently begun to show up on the global wine radar, but critical attention has been snowballing in the last year or two. There will doubtless come a time when the wines will be extremely difficult to obtain, and quite expensive for those who buy them on the open market. For now, however, Movia wines represent some of the highest quality wines for their price anywhere in the world, and should be experienced by anyone who considers themselves a curious wine lover or a fan of the cutting edge of winemaking.

The winery also has a second label called Movia Villa Marija under which it makes several less expensive bottlings. The winery makes a few more wines than those listed below, including several that I do not believe are imported to the US.

TASTING NOTES:

2000 Movia Puro Undisgorged Sparkling Wine, Brda, Slovenia
This wine comes bottled undisgorged, meaning that it has a plug of yeast in the neck of the bottle which must be removed before drinking. This involves icing the bottle upside down and then opening the bottle upside down, underwater, which pushes the yeast plug out but keeps the wine in. When you finally get it in your glass it is a slightly cloudy, pale gold color, with a nose of toasted brioche and brewers yeast. In the mouth it is beautifully crisp and very mineral with a honeyed quality that plays counterpoint to the calcium quality of the wine. While it lacks the deep complexity of some of the best Champagnes, this is a fantastic and quite unique sparkling wine made with 100% Pinot Noir. Score: between 9 and 9.5. Cost: $39. Where to buy?

1999 Movia Puro Brut Rose Undisgorged Sparkling Wine, Brda, Slovenia
Pale salmon-orange in color, this wine smells of homemade apple cider. On the palate it vaguely evokes cider, though with purer apple flavors, hints of bread and yeast, and soaring above these, the scent of jasmine or other aromatic white flowers on the breeze. Though this is made from 100% Pinot Noir it is nothing like any Brut Rose you have ever had. Head scratching and tongue tickling delicious. Score: between 9 and 9.5. Cost: $55. Where to buy?

2000 Movia Pinot Grigio, Brda, Slovenia
Pale gold in color, this wine offers classic aromas of linalool (think: Fruit Loops) and ripe pear. In the mouth it offers flavors of pear, lemon juice and grapefruit in a nicely balanced package that is effortless to drink. Score: around 9. Cost: $24. Where to buy?

2005 Movia Ribolla Gialla, Brda, Slovenia
Bright yellow in color, this wine smells of starfruit and sarsaparilla. In the mouth it is sexy, textured like something naughty, with flavors of pine sap, lemon cucumber, and tart Ranier cherries — an unlikely bouquet of tastes if there ever was one. But somehow these flavors cohere into a delicious, poised wine that drinks beautifully now and promises to age forever. Score: between 9 and 9.5. Cost: $26. Where to buy?

2005 Movia Sauvignon (Blanc), Brda, Slovenia
Pale green gold in the glass, this wine smells like my middle school classroom after we had just washed all the chalkboards. In the mouth it offers beautiful green flavors of starfruit and lime zest, with even a hint of cucumber as it finishes, zippy and bouncy like a small mountain stream. Great acids and nice weight on the palate, it might be interesting to see what this tastes like in 10 years. Score: between 9 and 9.5. Cost $23. Where to buy?

2003 Movia “Veliko Bianco” White Wine, Brda, Slovenia
Pale gold in color, this wine has a dazzling nose of honey and candied kumquat aromas. In the mouth it is beautifully balanced with crisp acidity and lively flavors of paraffin, kumquats, sarsaparilla, and a finish that seems to float on a bed of white flowers for minutes. Fantastic. Score: around 9.5. Cost: $33. Where to buy?

2005 Movia “Lunar” Ribolla Gialla, Brda, Slovenia
No two ways about it, this wine is orange. Specifically, a cloudy, light orange in color which makes it seem perfectly reasonable when you pick up the glass and smell gorgeous orange blossoms and wet stones. In the mouth it is silky and seductive and utterly confusing, as its flavors tend towards alpine strawberry along with orange blossoms and other white flowers, before some stony quality begins to grip the long finish. An unbelievably unique wine that will likely age and develop for decades. Score: between 9.5 and 10. Cost: $45. Where to buy?

2005 Movia “Veliko Rosso” Red Wine, Brda, Slovenia
Medium to dark ruby in color, this wine makes me hungry just smelling it. Grilled meats, bacon fat, nut skins, and tart cherries have me licking my lips before I even put it past them. In the mouth the wine is, dare I say it, the most graceful lumberjack you could imagine — some unearthly quality of forested roughness with poise and finesse that seems unlikely given the flavors of wild thyme, forest floor, and a beautiful core of cherry and plum fruit. The finish on this wine lasts well into the next sip, which I couldn’t postpone for long. Score: 9.5. Cost: $45. Where to buy?

1997 Movia “Izbrani Plodovi” Essencia, Brda, Slovenia
The color of dark root beer in the glass, this wine has an explosive nose of coffee and roasted nuts that I can smell before I even pick up the glass. In the mouth it hangs like liquid silk on the tongue with smoky flavors of coffee and roasted figs that morph into toffee, and spiced nuts as the wine sidles across the palate into a finish that lasts for minutes. I need my dessert wines to have some acidity, and this wine surprisingly does, keeping it from being cloying despite the quite high sugar levels. Quite unlike anything I’ve ever tasted. Score: around 9.5. Cost: $??

Original post by Alfonso Cevola

Coffee set to fetch higher prices after branding deal

Monday, May 26th, 2008

Story by DAVID MUGONYI in London
Publication Date: 5/26/2008

Coffee from Kenya will now attract higher prices following the signing of regulations governing the sector in London Sunday.

The regulations signed under the International Coffee Agreement will allow coffee from the country to be branded thereby fetching it higher prices.

The country’s coffee is among the best in quality in the world

Original post by Robert

8 Types Of Annoying People You’ll Find Inside Starbucks

Monday, May 26th, 2008

Robert’s note: If you have been in a Starbucks you will recognize most of these folks. Warning, the language in the article is “R” rated.

8. Manager Who Refuses to Recognize the Words Small, Medium, and Large
7. Intern Who is Buying for the Entire Office
6. The Writer Who Wants You to Know They’re a Writer
5. Overly Happy Line Greeter/Order Taker
4. Complicated Order Guy Who Needs his Coffee

Original post by Robert